Gender Mainstreaming Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccination Policy in Aceh: A Communication Perspective

Authors

  • Ade Irma Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry, Banda Aceh, Indonesia
  • Aklima Aklima Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry, Banda Aceh, Indonesia
  • Ramzi Murziqin Universitas Islam Negeri Ar-Raniry, Banda Aceh, Indonesia
  • Chaidir Ali Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59373/drs.v3i2.106

Keywords:

Gender Mainstreaming (GM), Gender-Responsive, Vaccination, COVID-19, Communication

Abstract

COVID-19 vaccination programs implemented under health emergency conditions risk reproducing gender inequities unless explicitly designed to accommodate the differentiated needs of men and women. This study examines Gender Mainstreaming (GM) in the implementation of COVID-19 vaccination services in Aceh Province, Indonesia, in 2021, with reference to Minister of Health Regulation No. 84 of 2020. The study aims to evaluate whether vaccination services were gender-responsive and to identify indicators of social inequality throughout the vaccination process. A concurrent mixed-methods design was employed, combining structured questionnaires, in-depth interviews, Focus Group Discussions, and documentary analysis. Data were collected from 320 respondents and 48 interviews across four sites — Banda Aceh City, Langsa City, Lhokseumawe City, and Bener Meriah Regency — and analyzed using the Gender Analysis Pathway (GAP) model across five dimensions: government commitment and policy, institutional framework, human resources, disaggregated data, and community participation. Findings indicate that COVID-19 vaccination in Aceh achieved an overall GM score of 85.84%, categorizing services as gender-sensitive and approaching gender-responsive. Nonetheless, indicators of social inequality were identified, particularly in the form of limited and uneven communication outreach, the absence of sex-disaggregated data presentation, and the reliance on administrative sanctions to mobilize participation rather than awareness-based approaches. These findings suggest that achieving genuinely gender-responsive health services requires not only regulatory compliance but also sustained capacity-building for field implementers and the adoption of equity-centered communication strategies at all levels of service delivery.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alfiatunnur, A., Hardy, M., Contractor, S. C., Nazliati, N., & Nashriyah, N. (2024). Social solidarity collaborative action for equality in education and poverty reduction post conflict and disaster in Aceh, Indonesia. GENDER EQUALITY: International Journal of Child and Gender Studies, 10(1), 118–134. https://doi.org/10.22373/EQUALITY.V10I1.22862

Amri, M., Yang, J., Jessiman-Perreault, G., Haikal, A., Barrett, K., & Bump, J. B. (2024). Equity and gender mainstreaming in public policy: A scoping review protocol. PLOS ONE, 19(2), e0299124. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0299124

Asi, Y. M., Bebasari, P., Hardy, E., Lokot, M., Meagher, K., Ogbe, E., Parray, A. A., Sharma, V., Standley, C. J., & Vahedi, L. (2022). Assessing gender responsiveness of COVID-19 response plans for populations in conflict-affected humanitarian emergencies. Conflict and Health, 16(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-022-00435-3

Caywood, K., & Darmstadt, G. L. (2024). Gender mainstreaming at 25 years: Toward an inclusive, collaborative, and structured research agenda. Journal of Global Health, 14. https://doi.org/10.7189/JOGH.14.04011

Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the Margins: Intersectionality, Identity Politics, and Violence against Women of Color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039

Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.

Daffa, M., & Purnamasari, D. (2024). The wisdom of ecofeminism in Arjasari as a link between Hadith and community practice. GENDER EQUALITY: International Journal of Child and Gender Studies, 10(1), 13–26. https://doi.org/10.22373/EQUALITY.V10I1.19835

Fariz, N. J. (2012). Teknik Analisis Gender. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta: Yogyakarta.

Fithriyah. (2017). Indonesia’s Experience: Implementing Gender Responsive Planning and Budgeting. Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan: The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning, 1(1), 59–75. https://doi.org/10.36574/JPP.V1I1.9

Flor, L. S., Friedman, J., Spencer, C. N., Cagney, J., Arrieta, A., Herbert, M. E., Stein, C., Mullany, E. C., Hon, J., Patwardhan, V., Barber, R. M., Collins, J. K., Hay, S. I., Lim, S. S., Lozano, R., Mokdad, A. H., Murray, C. J. L., Reiner Jr, R. C., Sorensen, R. J. D., … Gakidou, E. (2022). Quantifying the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on gender equality on health, social, and economic indicators: a comprehensive review of data from March, 2020, to September, 2021. The Lancet, 399(10344), 2381–2397. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00008-3

Galasso, V., Profeta, P., Foucault, M., & Pons, V. (2021). COVID-19 Vaccine’s Gender Paradox. MedRxiv, 2021.03.26.21254380. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.26.21254380

Hawkes, S., Pantazis, A., Purdie, A., Gautam, A., Kiwuwa-Muyingo, S., Buse, K., Tanaka, S., Borkotoky, K., Sharma, S., & Verma, R. (2022). Sex-disaggregated data matters: tracking the impact of COVID-19 on the health of women and men. Economia Politica, 39(1), 55–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40888-021-00254-4

Hunga, A., & Dhewy, A. (2021). Perempuan dalam Pandemi Covid-19: Kerentanan, Resiliensi, dan Relevansi Negara dalam Ekofeminisme V (pp. 311–322).

Lestyoningsih, I. H. (2020). Literatur Review: Implementasi Responsif Gender di Masa Pandemi COVID-19. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Kesehatan Masyarakat 2025, 1(1), 68–83. https://conference.upnvj.ac.id/index.php/semnashmkm2020/article/view/1052

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis. sage.

Morales, D. X., Beltran, T. F., & Morales, S. A. (2022). Gender, socioeconomic status, and COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the US: An intersectionality approach. Sociology of Health & Illness, 44(6), 953–971. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13474

Moyano, D. L., Martínez, M. L., & Martínez, L. L. (2022). Gender and social protection and health policies promoted during the COVID-19 pandemic: Global scoping review and future challenges. Journal of Global Health, 12. https://doi.org/10.7189/JOGH.12.05056

Pramiswari, A. A. A. I., Erviantono, T., & Novi, N. W. R. (2023). Kesetaraan Gender dan Kebijakan Pelayanan Kesehatan Masyarakat. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Sains Dan Humaniora, 7(2), 172–183. https://doi.org/10.23887/JPPSH.V7I2.66694

Pratama, M. Y., Yustina, I., Sudaryati, E., & Nurmaini. (2022). Community Engagement and Associated Factors for the COVID-19 Vaccination at the Work Area of Batang Kuis Public Health Center, Indonesia. Malaysian Journal of Medical Research (MJMR), 6(1), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.31674/MJMR.2022.V06I01.005

Rusiah, A., Hamdanah, H., Nurhamdah, N., & Nanning, N. (2018). Analisis Program dan Kegiatan Responsif Gender pada Dinas Kesehatan Kota Parepare. AL-MAIYYAH : Media Transformasi Gender Dalam Paradigma Sosial Keagamaan, 11(1), 80–110. https://ejurnal.iainpare.ac.id/index.php/almaiyyah/article/view/545

Saputra, M., Marlinae, L., Rahman, F., & Rosadi, D. (2015). Program Jaminan Kesehatan Nasional dari Aspek Sumber Daya Manusia Pelaksana Pelayanan Kesehatan. Jurnal Kesehatan Masyarakat; Vol 11, No 1 (2015)DO - 10.15294/Kemas.V11i1.3462. https://journal.unnes.ac.id/nju/kemas/article/view/3462

Sugiyono, P. (2015). Metode penelitian kombinasi (mixed methods). Bandung: Alfabeta, 28(1), 12.

Tomsick, E., Smith, J., & Wenham, C. (2022). A gendered content analysis of the World Health Organization’s COVID-19 guidance and policies. PLOS Global Public Health, 2(6), e0000640. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000640

Toshkov, D. (2023). Explaining the gender gap in COVID-19 vaccination attitudes. European Journal of Public Health, 33(3), 490–495. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurpub/ckad052

Vélez, A. C. G., Coates, A., Garcia, V. Di., & Wolfenzon, D. (2021). Igualdad de género y equidad en salud: lecciones estratégicas de las experiencias de los países en la incorporación de la perspectiva de género en la salud. Revista Panamericana de Salud Publica/Pan American Journal of Public Health, 45. https://doi.org/10.26633/RPSP.2021.103

Vlassoff, C., & Moreno, C. G. (2002). Placing gender at the centre of health programming: challenges and limitations. Social Science & Medicine, 54(11), 1713–1723. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00339-2

Wagner, A. L., Jacobson, M., Mellen, R. C., Adiratna, W., Treleaven, E., Ramadona, A. L., Padmawati, R. S., & Prabandari, Y. S. (2025). Gotong royong and COVID-19 vaccination in Indonesia: Linking communal values to collective immunity. Public Health in Practice, 10, 100677. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhip.2025.100677

Wenham, C., Smith, J., & Morgan, R. (2020). COVID-19: the gendered impacts of the outbreak. The Lancet, 395(10227), 846–848. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30526-2

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications (Vol. 6). Sage Thousand Oaks, CA.

Zintel, S., Flock, C., Arbogast, A. L., Forster, A., von Wagner, C., & Sieverding, M. (2022). Gender differences in the intention to get vaccinated against COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Zeitschrift Fur Gesundheitswissenschaften, 31(8), 1. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10389-021-01677-W

Downloads

Published

2025-11-22

How to Cite

Irma, A., Aklima, A., Murziqin, R., & Ali, C. (2025). Gender Mainstreaming Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccination Policy in Aceh: A Communication Perspective. Dirasah International Journal of Islamic Studies, 3(2), 274–288. https://doi.org/10.59373/drs.v3i2.106